Few days back we published an article revealing how Seth rich was murdered and the possible life threat ahead of Julian asange as the Ecuadorian embassy keeps closing the walls there built to protect him.
If you missed that article check below the comments for links.
“Moving on,as we start a new year there seem to be more controversy ahead as the democratic cabals keep pressing for asange to be handed over to the united states to answer questions concerning leaked emails belonging to Hilary Clinton which were published on his website causing serious damage to the campaign of the. 2016 presidential aspirant from the democratic party.
Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani however have come publicly to defend asange citing facts that reveal hypocritical tendencies by people calling for his head.
Giuliani made the comments on Sunday after he was asked on Fox & Friends whether he was “open to the idea” that the emails stolen from Hillary Clinton’s staffers “may have been accepted” by her rivals in the team of then-candidate Donald Trump.
WikiLeaks has never revealed the source of the hacked emails, saying only that it was not Russia and it was “not a state party.”
Giuliani, who is Trump’s attorney and long-time friend, acknowledged that the hack itself was a crime and those responsible for it should “go to jail.” Nevertheless, he defended Assange’s decision to publish the emails.
“No press person or person disseminating that for the purpose of informing did anything wrong.”
The former mayor of New York also pointed out that the US mainstream media chose to publish the Pentagon Papers – classified documents on the Vietnam War which were leaked to the press – and information on the abuse of detainees by US troops in Abu Ghraib, Iraq in the 2000s.
“The Pentagon Papers were stolen property, weren’t they? They were stolen from the Pentagon and given to the New York Times and the Washington Post,” Giuliani stated on Fox & Friends. “Nobody went to jail at the New York Times and the Washington Post.”
Once media outlets obtain leaked information, they “can publish it for the purpose of informing people,” and the same applies to Assange, he said.
You can’t put Assange in a different position. We may not like what he communicates, but he was a media facility. He was putting that information out. Every newspaper [and] station grabbed it and published it.
follow us on twitter @Thewikidaily